Water Pollution : 5

Facio-krajcer, A., Cowan, J., & Welsh, A. (2022, July 31). When there’s arsenic in the water, but ‘we have nowhere to go’. The New York Times. Retrieved August 28, 2022, from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/31/us/oasis-mobile-home-park-coachella.html 

 

In Oasis Mobile Home Park, many farm workers and their families face problems with the quality of their water. Research discovered that the water in this park contains almost 10 times the allowable limit of arsenic. Unfortunately, it is very hard for these people to find alternate water sources. The families and people living in the park have suffered through many health issues due to the water such as rashes, red bumps, kidney disease, etc. New management at the park claimed that they have spent more than 400,000 dollars to fix the quality of the water and even more to provide clean bottled water but the residents are still not able to use the water from the tap. Though the water may be bad, many people don’t have anywhere else that they can afford to move to. If they attempt to do so and fail, their old spot in the mobile home park would already be sold to a new family. Much research has been done on the water in the area and people believe that it is best to focus on moving the families to a proper living area for the water is far too contaminated to be fixed. For now, people are still in these mobile home parks but though the water levels may be dangerous, they are provided with free clean bottled water.

 

This article was more personal to a specific area/people ( people who live in the Oasis Mobile Home Park ). This was a great example of an environment that is suffering due to the shortage of a required natural resource. In this case, people are getting rashes and other diseases most likely due to the water which is nowhere near considered safe for consumption. I would say this article was a little more emotional because these people can’t leave this area. They must stay here with the poor water, living off the bottled water that is provided for them. I’m a little confused about what people are doing because it seems so far, all that was done was some research and providing free bottled water to the people living here. It doesn’t really seem like much is being done for the people living in the area which has been a common theme for all the big organizations throughout these articles.

 

4 thoughts on “Water Pollution : 5

  1. I agree with you that there is an emotional connection to this issue, making it harder for people who need to leave not being mentally able to do so. Without government intervention, what can the people do together to clean up the water fast? Maybe not in the most long term sustainable way, but just to get it started?

  2. I agree with you that this is a very tough topic and very emotionally tied. How do you think we can value/balance our emotions like fear in situations where we are deciding on climate change issues?

  3. I liked the analysis of the emotional connection to the issue. What do you think could be done today to start reversing some of the damage done. What do you think could be done longterm to start undoing some of the damage.

  4. I agree that this topic is very important. And liked how you mentioned the amount it cost to fix. How long would it take for this to be fixed?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *