New WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines aim to save millions of lives from air pollution

“New WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines aim to save millions of lives from air pollution.” WHO | World Health Organization, 22 September 2021, https://www.who.int/news/item/22-09-2021-new-who-global-air-quality-guidelines-aim-to-save-millions-of-lives-from-air-pollution. Accessed 6 February 2022.

WHO, the World Health Organization has concluded that air pollution affects human health at a lower concentration than previously determined in 2005. Killing 7 million people every year, they have adjusted almost all the AQGs levels downwards to create safer breathing air people in all parts of the world, but mostly in low- and middle-income countries. This includes the pollutants particulate matter (PM), ozone (O₃), nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) sulfur dioxide (SO₂) and carbon monoxide (CO). To reach these goals WHO has established “interim targets” to insure a gradual improvement in air quality and health. 

When reading this article I found the number of deaths per year to be overwhelming and surprising in some aspects. While I was aware that air pollution can and does affect human health, it didn’t occur to me that a majority of these deaths are premature. I identify air pollution as a contributor to the environment in the sense that it worsens the greenhouse effect, but after reading this article I understand that humans are a large part of the environment. Environmental science is the study of the environment and addressing human effects is important to that field. Having narrowed down the six pollutants, I think that moving forward organizations like WHO will be able to effectively methodize. Especially living in an area that experienced a bad air quality index during fire season, while my understanding is from small periods, when the air clears there is a sense of relief. I can’t help but feel hopeful that these current goals will be effective and improve air quality.

 

2 thoughts on “New WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines aim to save millions of lives from air pollution

  1. Ryann- I think after these past few years we all have a new appreciation for breathing clean air. I do think it’s a different issue than climate change… the increase in CO2 isn’t directly affecting our lungs. Imagine you have some knowledge of the NOx, SOx, and PM sources. Did the article say how it actually counts the deaths? I do wonder about stats like that. I would think often times the cause of death is unclear but happens to be in a city with polluted air. Do you think these fatality stats are accurate?

    • The article didn’t mention anything like that I believe but I do agree that the fatalities aren’t caused by CO2, it is an accumulation of the situation as a whole. The emissions from things like traffic cause an unhealthy breathing environment, which can cause lung disease and utimalty a spiral of health issue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *