Gas prices in California will soar following the LA ban on new oil and gas wells, industry rep warns.

Talia, Kaplan. (February 1, 2022) Gas prices in California will soar following the LA ban on new oil and gas wells, industry rep warns. Retrieved from February 4th, 2022, from

https://www.foxbusiness.com/energy/how-will-los-angeles-ban-on-new-oil-and-gas-wells-impact-drivers-wallets

In Los Angeles California, gas prices could be on an even more extreme rise as oil production is even more limited. Los Angeles City Council voted to ban new oil wells along with phasing out preexisting wells. Arguments against the movement, state that this will create a loss of jobs and raise the price of gas. If more gas production is phased out in California more will be imported raising the prices even more. In response job programs have been created by the council for the workers. 

I think that this is a great decision by the city as they are working to phase outgas. Along with this, even the downsides are somewhat beneficial, as gas prices rise people will want to use less of it, therefore, creating a push for alternatives and a move to alternatives. I think that this is all great news for our future world as although yes we will still be importing oils and gasses it will be much more expensive and incentivize more change. Also, we will not be taxing our land by drilling or extracting oils which yes we will still be polluting the land but we won’t be disrupting the integrity of it as much. This move is a great step in the long push to minimize oil and gas usage from our world. 

 

Did California Issue Its Last Fracking Permit?

LA, Times. (2021, December 17). Did California Issue Its Last Fracking Permit? Retrieved January 27, 2022, from https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-12-17/fracking-permits

I couldn’t access the site again without subscribing so I do not know the author^

State oil and gas regulators have been denying hydraulic fracturing(Fracking) permits in California. No new permits have been issued since February of 2021, although there have been over 100 requests. And is the start of a new age may be as this is the first year California has denied a permit, this news could mean an end to fracking within California. The goal of the state and oil regulators is to limit the effects of oil extraction and therefore, hopefully, production in California as they have related to the heatwaves, wildfires, and droughts. Along with the impact that hydraulic fracking has on the communities nearby and the people within them. Although over 500 new permits have been granted for oil and gas drilling, the government plans to decrease the number gradually to not fully shock the economy. 

I think that this is great news within California, although fracking makes up only about 2% of all oil production within California it shows the government is starting to phase out oil production. Fracking as an industry was harmful and not needed as it only was so limited so to see that the Government realized that and made it a priority to remove it means something. I do agree with the plans which are to slowly phase out the oil drilling within California gradually too and not all at once, because if we were to phase it out immediately not only would economic problems occur but our society would not be adapted or ready enough to embrace the full change too. 

 

California moves to ban oil wells within 3,200 feet of homes and schools.

Emma, Newburger (2021 October, 21). California moves to ban oil wells within 3,200 feet of homes and schools. Retrieved January 27, 2022, from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/21/california-moves-to-ban-oil-wells-within-3200-feet-of-homes-schools.html

Governor Gavin Newsom proposed to have a 3,200-foot buffer zone, separating schools, homes, and hospitals from oil and gas wells. Any wells within the zones would be required to implement new pollution controls. California has no pre-existing buffer zone which causes the 7th highest oil-producing states, residents, many health problems. Including asthma and other birth defects. This oil buffer zone is not something new as other states have already implemented similar regulations but California would be the largest in the country. The overall downside of this would be the impact on the oil industry and its workers.

 

I think this is a great thing, it is a small step towards moving away from fossil fuels and is helping communities and their health. The new regulations would also help the environment around the wells which would be amazing. And although fracking wasn’t able to be banned this as I said would be a small but crucial step towards moving California a major fossil fuel producer and consumer away from it all. Yes, this would affect the price of fossil fuels but that as well helps motivate people to move away from them and to new renewable sources. 

 

California Oil Spill Prompts New Push to Ban Offshore Drilling.

Matt, Vasilogambros. (2021, December 20). California Oil Spill Prompts New Push to Ban Offshore Drilling. Retrieved January 28, 2022, from https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2021/12/20/california-oil-spill-prompts-new-push-to-ban-offshore-drilling

 

After a 25,000-gallon oil spill off the shore of Huntington beach. Many propose, to ban offshore drilling in California; requiring going through federal and state jurisdictions, along with voiding contracts. Newsom already called to end all oil extraction by 2045, but the majority of California’s workforce is within the oil and creates strong opposition. Opposition proposes to create an oil tax, therefore, using oil tax money to support conservation efforts and coastal restoration efforts. Many other states have already put bans in place on offshore drilling showing it is possible for California. California already banned any new leases to offshore drilling after 1994 but drilling operations before the ban are still allowed. Many of these rigs are outdated and have lived past their expected lifespans yet continue to operate and help California to be the 7th largest producer of oil within the country. Many think that all the rigs should be shut down as each passing year exponentially increases the odds of a spill due to the rig’s age. These dismantling projects as a whole would take billions and many years. 

I think this is striking seeing how detrimental the spill was and seeing that although people are calling for action, none has been taken or seemingly won’t for a while. Many of the rigs should simply not be in service due to their age and wear yet they still operate and further risk the oceans and ecosystems around the coast of California. The opposition to the dismantled plans does bring up good alternatives such as an oil tax which would be very beneficial. But change should happen and so many people are valuing their economic wealth over environmental health and I think that this is crazy. The projects would cost both sides extreme amounts of money but wouldn’t that save the money that is required to clean the oceans and restore the damage? We are starting to see the signs of deteriorating offshore oil rigs and it is just the start, only more problems are going to occur and more spills will happen. Yes, it would drive down the oil production of the 7th highest producing state in the nation, and would overall drive down the amount of oil within the US and require more imported oil. But this would force innovation and the move to renewable energy.

 

Global study finds the extent of pharmaceutical pollution in the world’s rivers

The research led by Dr. John Wilkinson, the Global Monitoring of Pharmaceuticals Projects, uncovered staggering water pollution statistics stemming from pharmaceutical companies worldwide. The study is the first where the global scientific community came together to monitor the practices contributing to environmental issues. Two hundred fifty-eight rivers across the globe were studied for pollutants such as caffeine, metformin, and carbamazepine. The findings show the need to monitor countries in the lower levels of socioeconomic status as they tend to be the most significant contributor to pharmaceutical pollution. The project raises awareness of how countries contribute to pollution and the types of pollutants never before tracked. With this information, change can be instituted to disrupt these unsafe practices. 

This article brings up the point that poorer countries need significant support from advanced countries, especially in production and manufacturing. Global Monitoring of Pharmaceuticals Project promises to raise the awareness of these countries in need of better ways of production. It is sobering to see the data from the study, which confirms that lower socio-economic entities behave in destructive ways, which correlates to individuals suffering from lower socio-economic status. For example, they choose the easiest way to survive because they lack the resources to behave in ways that preserve well-being. Still, I hope this project can shed more light on countries that can benefit from a collaborative approach where sharing engineering best practices can lead them to clean up their act.

Groups urge probe into water pollution

Xu, Xiao. “Groups urge probe into water pollution.” Globe & Mail [Toronto, Canada], 22 July 2021, p. A6. Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A669266669/OVIC?u=usfca_gleeson&sid=bookmark-OVIC&xid=9496faa6. Accessed 20 Jan. 2022.

In Ottawa, Canada, Teck Resources, a mining company was fined $60M after investigations showed the company’s reckless disregard of the rules and regulations protecting the ocean from water pollution. Environmentalist groups highlighted that the company released selenium and calcite pollution into the North American waters. Both US and the International Joint Commission released a letter holding Canada responsible for not reprimanding Teck for the violations. The Canadian government responded that there will be new regulations finalized by 2023 to limit the levels of pollutants.

This article highlights the need for government oversight “watchdogs.” This article questions Canada’s reputation for being eco-friendly. It seems that this huge oversight, failing to monitor mining companies and their practices, will be detrimental not only to the Canadian environment but also to the world. A $60M fine to the largest coal mining company, Teck Resources, who pleaded guilty over the misdeed, seems criminal. Although the article stated that revised and stricter regulations will be made final in 2023, I am curious to see how Canada will clean up the mess at hand.

United Kingdom: Funding boost for farmers to tackle water pollution

“United Kingdom: Funding boost for farmers to tackle water pollution.” Mena Report, 3 Aug. 2021, Gale Academic OneFile, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A670595323/AONE?u=usfca_gleeson&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=0718503e. Accessed 20 Jan. 2022.

On August 2nd of 2021, the U.K. Government announced that funding for Catchment Sensitive Farming (CSF) would be nearly doubled in order to prevent future fertilizer, soil, and manure runoff from polluting rivers. The Catchment Sensitive Farming program allows farmers access to advice on managing their farmland while reducing pollution efficiently. For many years, one farmer involved with CSF described how the program has helped with soil health, drainage, and structure while also cutting operating costs on his dairy farm.

This article highlights the importance of collaboration between government agencies, farmers, and landowners. Teaching citizens and workers how to be more environmentally conscious rather than punishing them with taxes once they mess up is more effective, in my opinion. Only good can come from showing farmers how their actions are harmful and teaching them how to increase efficiency while simultaneously preventing potential crises. Other major agricultural countries such as the US, China, and Russia need to adopt similar practices that encourage farmers to be more mindful of pollution. I sincerely hope that putting more money into this fantastic initiative will successfully inspire other nations to do the same.

This ‘Plastic Man’ Has a Cape and a Superhero’s Mission: Cleaning Up Senegal

This ‘Plastic Man’ Has a Cape and a Superhero’s Mission: Cleaning Up Senegal By Mady Camara and Ruth Maclean Jan. 20, 2022 https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/20/world/africa/modou-fall-senegal.html?searchResultPosition=4.

An educator, defender, and protector of the Senegalese environment, Modou Fall works to eliminate his country’s number one cause of pollution: plastics. Senegal is one of the largest polluters of the world’s oceans. Although the government has made efforts to ban the use of plastics, its large coastal population continues to mismanage the production and use of plastics. The impact of the polluted waters off the coast of Dakar affects all but especially the livelihood of Senegalese fishers. Efforts displayed by Fall extended to a demonstration during the famous marathon day in Dakar. Dressed in plastic garb, Fall focuses on his mission to rid his country of plastic.

This article demonstrates how a single person’s actions can lead to change. One of the most prominent issues preventing the world from making substantial progress with climate change is the idea that individual actions will not make a difference. If nobody thinks their actions will lead to something greater, nobody will do anything to make a change. Fortunately, people like Fall understand how they can positively affect the environment and encourage people within the environment to join him. It makes me so hopeful and happy that people are fighting for change in countries that are causing substantial damage to our oceans where there may not be as much awareness and action. 

This Fjord Shows Even Small Populations Create Giant Microfiber Pollution

This Fjord Shows Even Small Populations Create Giant Microfiber Pollution By Jessica Leigh Hester, Sept. 28, 2021 

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/28/science/microfiber-pollution

Microplastic researchers found considerable amounts of microfibers deposited in the fjords of Norway, presumably produced by the tiny village of Svalbard’s (a Norwegian archipelago) unfiltered sewage system. The volume of waste, roughly 18 billion microfibers, presents dangerous implications for surrounding waters and sea life in the Arctic. The researchers continue to gather evidence to support policy changes regarding sewage management, fundamental filtration changes at the city level, and waste clean-up, including efforts by individual communities. Scientists hope to introduce a more timely solution, a filtration system to capture large debris, also preventing smaller bits of microplastics from entering the waterways. 

It is unbelievable that a village with a population of fewer than 3,000 people has the potential to cause this much destruction to the environment. Svalbard alone is not equipped with the resources to handle a mess of this size, and people in power, such as Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre in this case, need to be held accountable for environmental crises occurring off of the mainland. As one of the most eco-friendly nations in the world, it is their responsibility not only to monitor and manage water pollution but also to encourage and provide everyone with the resources to prevent situations like these.

The New Era of Composting

Lormon, John L, and Matthew L Abbot. “California Businesses Face New Organic Waste Mandates in 2022.” Procopio, Procopio, 30 Jan. 2022, https://www.procopio.com/california-businesses-face-new-organic-waste-mandates-in-2022/

Organic waste collection regulation has now come into effect starting January 1, 2022, for local jurisdictions. Senate Bill 1383 will now require the department of recycling and the state air resource board to implement new strategies to reduce emissions that have relatively short lifetimes. The health and safety code will require state reduction for methane cutting it 40% below and landfill to cut by 75% from organic waste. Commercial businesses must now provide containers for their customers, employees, contractors, etc. to be provided with a waste bin conducting that compost be separated from regular waste. The regulation will have a permit for each local business to stay running and open monitored by jurisdiction. 

I didn’t know how much composting can reduce emissions by severity, I mean if individuals can just regularly selective and divide compost waste and regular waste from going into landfills and have such a great reduction it should be implied for everyone to do it not just local businesses. The statistics given in this article show how around America this has been regulated and is now being brought to California for local businesses to keep in mind how much severity they do by not composting and it being brought to landfills where it’s producing so much methane.