Reed, Betsy. “Food, Feed and Fuel: Global Seaweed Industry Could Reduce Land Needed for Farming by 110m Hectares, Study Finds.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 26 Jan. 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/27/food-feed-and-fuel-global-seaweed-industry-could-reduce-land-needed-for-farming-by-110m-hectares-study-finds
A new study suggests that seaweed farming could provide food, feed supplements, and alternative fuels, by growing on an area of ocean almost the size of Australia. The study estimates that if seaweed could constitute 10% of human diets by 2050, it could reduce the land needed for food by 110 million hectares, an area twice the size of France. However, the study also notes that there are potential negative impacts on marine life that will need to be balanced with the benefits. The study identified 650 million hectares as plausible for seaweed farming, with the largest areas in Indonesia and Australia.
As much as I do think it is important to reach out and find sources for biofuel in different parts of the ocean, it is ultimately important to protect the habitats that live in those areas. This is because the ultimate goal of biofuel is to help fight climate change, and with process of using seaweed and potentially harming the life that already lives in those areas, I feel like we are hurting the climate and wildlife around us, and that might not be worth it for the biofuel. It sounds hypocritical, like we are breaking our one promise. However, if we look at the positive effects we can additionaly see that seaweed farming may constitute 10% of human diets by 2050, which would reduce the land needed for food by 110 million hectares, as mentioned in the article, which would tremendously help human consumption and climate change. All in all, the article makes it clear that this method of seaweed farming is a double-edged sword in the end.