Wildlife and Habitat Conservation News: Obama Rejects Keystone XL Pipeline

Wildlife and Habitat Conservation News: Obama Rejects Keystone XL Pipeline. (2015, November 9). Retrieved November 23, 2015, from http://www.enn.com/wildlife/article/49141

Obama rejected the Keystone XL Pipeline on November 9, 2015, stating that the oil pipeline was not in America’s best interests. There has been a fierce debate between business and environmentalists, with 2 million comments submitted to the State Department and thousands of rallies against the Keystone Pipeline throughout the nation. Obama believed that the environmental cost of the pipeline was too much. He stated that the cost to people and wildlife would be enormous, and that it would trump the potential profit. Environmentalists hope that his decision will mark a turning point in American history, where we start using sustainable energy sources instead of fossil fuels.

This article focuses on the political science aspect of environmental science. The debate about this pipeline has raged for years, and culminated with a win for the climate. However, the fossil fuel lobby isn’t done yet. In the coming years, they will attempt to impede substantial alternative energy legislation. While this is a major win, environmental advocacy groups may not fully grasp the fight ahead of them. Fossil fuels are deeply engrained in American society. It powers our cars, and provides billions of dollars in revenue every year. While our dependency on fossil fuels has been stopped from increasing, it will be an entirely different matter altogether to substitute alternative energy for already existing fossil fuel sources.

Walking vs. Riding

Riding in a car can expose you to 15x as much air pollution as walking on the street. (2014, September 24). Retrieved November 24, 2014, from http://www.naturalnews.com/046995_air_pollution_automobiles_walking.html

According to the scientists, riding through the city in a car exposed a person to air pollution that is 15 times greater than walking or riding a bike.  Black carbon levels in cabs travelling throughout the city were 15 times greater than levels recorded outside of City Hall.  Black carbon is a type of soot that’s formed as a result of burning of fossil fuels.  Cyclists and walkers seem to be less affected because of their continuous movement allows them to breathe fresh air.

The article provides one of the ways to reduce pollution and at the same time, to be healthy.  As I was reading the article, I was considering of maybe biking or walking to school because that is how persuasive the article is.  The information that was given is interesting that anyone who will read the article might have a different view of riding throughout the city.  I think if most of the people might able to do of what the article says, that will be one less problem to worry about in our environment.