This article talks about public land use and how President Trump has power to help but doesn’t believe in public land use.The components of public health and safety, clean water, open space, and a chemical-free food chain can use really big help right now. It talks about endangered species and how we are destroying their habitats. Fischler believes that public land use is being destructive because of the big people( Trump).In the West, where the bureau’s land includes prime habitat for wildlife, an open range for hunters, and etc, public land use is a priority.
The article is related to environmental science because it shows public land use. From this article you can tell that he, Trump, doesn’t believe in any of this and decides to not help, but hurt it: “President Donald Trump’s choice to lead the Bureau of Land Management has supported mining near the Grand Canyon, livestock grazing in federally protected areas, resource extraction at national monuments and generally opposed federal management of Western lands — all positions conservationists in Arizona say would hurt the state’s public lands”( Fischler). In my opinion I feel like public land use should be portrayed more to the outside world because it can go really bad or we can sustain it based on how humans decide to take care of it. With many people not caring and Trump, we can bring ruin to the public and destroy the environment, including the animals and their homes.
This reflection is interesting because it does show one perspective on governmental involvement in our persisting global issues. As this world does continue to develop, I would anticipate that issues like this, in which groups of individuals who have the power to help, will continue. What ways do you propose would have been actions that the (former) President could have taken to target public land use?