Polis’ land use bill aimed to blunt climate change. Conservation groups say watering it down is a ‘huge disappointment’

Minor, N. (2023, April 29). Polis’ land use bill aimed to blunt climate change. Conservation groups say watering it down is a ‘huge disappointment.’ Colorado Public Radio. https://www.cpr.org/2023/04/28/polis-land-use-bill-aimed-to-blunt-climate-change-conservation-groups-say-watering-it-down-is-a-huge-disappointment/

 

A zoning bill allowing for higher-density housing in Colorado was deemed controversial. The SB23-213 has been revised for more support, resulting in what some say are key aspects of the bill being removed. Higher-density developments and housing have directly been linked to a lower carbon footprint. A portion allowing a higher population density and laxer parking laws in certain areas has been taken out. The result is a half-stripped bill that holds much smaller promises than were previously supported. 

 

There’s a call for a statewide approach, but I wonder what state-led zoning support would look like. Especially in relation to population growth and land development. There are arguments to be made that more land zoning laws would result in slower development and fall behind in sufficient housing for the population, further exacerbating the cost of living and limited housing crisis. All of these must be taken into consideration when deciding on this type of legislation. Human safety, health, and even economic developments are the priority and will be held to a higher degree of importance in decision-making before any decisions are made on climate change. 

2 thoughts on “Polis’ land use bill aimed to blunt climate change. Conservation groups say watering it down is a ‘huge disappointment’

  1. I also find this zoning law interesting. I do wonder, though, if this zoning law will have any negative impacts, and the higher density housing will hurt the environment in any way. Often higher density housing does have a good ecological impact, but I wonder what the negative impacts are. Do you also wonder the negative impacts are too? Let me know what you think.

  2. I agree with how the zoning support will be something to keep an eye on. Especially with how focused California is on growth and development, based on the 2023 housing elements forcing cities to build affordable housing units, it is good to worry about where all this development will come from. Having more development is good, but it seems like that it could be just as detrimental here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *