Goodbye Hogs

Smith, M. (2017, March 12). Texas lawmakers say more study needed before. Retrieved March 13, 2017, from http://www.khou.com/news/local/texas/texas-lawmakers-say-more-study-needed- before-hog-apocalypse/421889664

This article discusses the invasive feral hog problem that is happening in Texas; millions of feral hogs continue to run wild across the, destroying native plants and in turn the habitats of many other native species. The population of feral hogs in Texas as of now is around 2 million, and scientists are trying to find a way to kill the hogs humanely. While lawmakers have recently passed the lethal feral hog poison “Kaput”, farmers are worried that it will negatively affect their crops, along with the fact that it could also hurt the environment. As a result of this, scientists are trying to find an alternative that will not hurt crops and humanely euthanize the hogs.

I found this article interesting because I usually think of invasive species as small creatures, but the fact that these large hogs have become such an invasive threat just sparked my interest. This article shows how invasive species negatively impact the environment, and how it can be hard to find a solution to the havoc wreaked by them. In this case, when a solution was proposed, it would negatively effect crops and air quality, which is scary in that it shows that the possibility of eliminating one environmental threat brings up a new environmental threat. I am interested to see how Texas will approach this situation again in the future because of how major of a problem these invasive species have become.

Warmer Winter= More invasive species.. Why?

Roscoe, J. (2017, March 2). A warmer winter and earlier spring could mean more invasive bugs for Maryland. Retrieved March 11, 2017, from http://www.dbknews.com/2017/03/03/warm- winter-invasive-species-maryland/

This article talks about how rising temperatures in winter months in Maryland allow invasive insects such as the stink bug to thrive, as opposed to previous cold winters when the single digit temperatures would kill the insects before they could repopulate in the spring and summer. However, for the third consecutive year, the temperatures in Maryland have rarely dropped into

single digits, which has allowed invasive insects, mainly the stinkbug, to continue to love throughout the winter. This does not allow the environment, such as certain crops or fruits, to have a period in which they are undisturbed by invasive insects, which can affect the crops.

I thought that this article was interesting because it tied two aspects of the environment into one: invasive species and climate change. The annual increasing temperatures, even in the winter months, have effected the environment in the aspect that the warmer temperatures allow the invasive species to harm the environment year round. This ties into global warming and really gave me the perspective that all aspects of the environment are connected, there is not any part that is more influential than another.

Samurai Wasps… can they be good?

Ferro, J. (2017, March 06). Stink bug killers: Scientists to release Samurai wasps. Retrieved March 11, 2017, from http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/story/tech/science/environment/ 2017/03/06/stink-bugs-samurai-wasps-invasive-species/98593216/

This article touches mainly on the invasive stink bug that was introduced from Asia and widespread across the United States. The stink bugs destroy crops by sticking their teeth into the crop and sucking out the juice of it; last year stink bugs destroyed 18% of Mid atlantic apple production, which cost over $37M in profit loss. As a solution to this problem, scientists are utilizing another, less harmful, invasive species, the Samurai Wasp. Samurai Wasps lay their eggs inside of stink bug eggs, which destroy the stink bug eggs. Scientists are proposing that Samurai wasps are introduced into areas where stinkbugs are prominent in order to eradicate the stink bugs and make them unable to reproduce because of the destruction of their eggs by the Samurai wasp.

I thought that this article was very interesting because it talked about using a non threatening invasive species to a threatening and destructive invasive species. It made me realize that not all invasive species are destructive and harmful and usually only the bad ones are talked about in the media or made into a big deal (understandably). This article relates to environmental science because it shows how environmental scientists are able to manipulate species in order to improve the environment without having to necessarily harm the environment, such as using massive amounts of pesticide to eradicate the stink bugs would. I would like to know what happens with the Samurai wasps and if they’re able to kill off the stink bugs, I am going to continue to follow up on this news report!

$11m towards invasive species?

French, B. (2017, February 14). FWP requests $11M to fight invasive species. Retrieved March 11, 2017, from http://mtstandard.com/news/state-and-regional/fwp-requests-m-to-fight-invasive- species/article_64d5c3a5-0f2a-5b37-9645-569446139161.html

This article talks about how the FWP is requesting $11.5M from the government over the next two years in order to fight aquatic invasive species in Montana. The major invasive species is the zebra mussel, which is projected to cost the government $3.1B over the next 10 years if the eradication process of this incredibly invasive species is not ramped up; specific statistics show that when zebra mussels clog major water pipes in Montana, the damage and the fixation process can cost up to $5,000/ hour. Montana Wildlife and Parks is requesting this major sum of money because they are worried for their irrigation systems and infrastructure, and if given the money they will use it towards the eradication of invasive species in an attempt to save such them.

I think that this article is interesting because it really shows how incredible of an impact invasive species can have on a society and what drastic financial measures that governments are willing to take in order to get rid of them. In regards to environmental science, this article shows how matters in the environment can effect humans and their ways of life in such a drastic way, and how invasive species can take such a toll on the functioning of a society. I liked this article because I had never really thought about how invasive species influenced the entirety of our country, I had thought only about major cities and states like California and Texas, but never really pondered over the fact that invasive species are effecting people across the entire country.

Invasive Species in New York

Nir, S. M. (2017, February 08). Downside of Being a Global Hub: Invasive Species. Retrieved March 11, 2017, from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/nyregion/a-new-york-battle-to- thwart-migrants-of-a-different-type.html?_r=0

This article is talking about New York City and the fact that the city is such a worldwide hub of imports and exports have consequences, one of the main consequences being that this causes invasive species to penetrate the city. Due to having some of the most travelled airports in the United States, Nir states that it is not difficult for invasive species to enter New York, and in present day there are over 100 invasive species in the city alone, making it by far the city with the most invasive species in the US. In New York alone, the annual budget for fighting invasive species is $5.5 million.

I found this article interesting because I had no idea that so many invasive species were in New York City itself, I had some idea of it but when I envisioned the invasive species I imagined them mostly in the ocean or aquatic, never in the midst of the city. This article relates to environmental science in that it connects human activity to the destruction of the environment and brings into perspective how more human-intensive areas are more likely to face environmental destruction such as invasive species. I liked this article not only because it gave me a perspective I had not thought about in the past but also made me realize how travel and importing of foreign goods can have a negative effect on the environment.

Earthquakes in California tied to fracking

Page, S. (2016, February 05). New Study Ties Fracking Water Disposal To California

Earthquakes. Retrieved March 13, 2017, from https://thinkprogress.org/new-study-ties-fracking-water-disposal-to-california-earthquakes-8b2f8f81cd1#.q82sks6mw

 

A new study released on February 2, 2017, linked a set of earthquakes in Bakersfield from 2005 to fracking operations several kilometers away.  This is not the first time fracking has been connected to earthquakes; a number of studies have pointed to fracking as the cause of earthquakes in Oklahoma, where the situation has gotten so dangerous that the Oklahoma Corporation Commission has asked companies to stop fracking in some areas.  Studies have proven that fracking can lead to earthquakes occurring years later and several miles away.  Given that more wastewater has been injected in California than in Oklahoma, there may be reason to believe there is serious risk of causing major seismic activity.

 

Earthquakes are not new to California given that it lies on the San Andreas fault.  Given California’s history with disastrous earthquakes and the numerous studies that link fracking to seismic activity, there is every reason to believe that fracking in California will lead to disaster.  When researchers are already concerned with the amount of seismic activity that is occurring, allowing fracking without strict regulation would be grossly irresponsible.

Monterey County blocks fracking

Cama, T. (2016, November 09). California county votes to ban fracking. Retrieved March 13,

2017, from http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/305198-california-county-

votes-to-ban-fracking

 

On November 8th, 2017, voters in Monterey County voted to pass a measure to ban hydraulic fracturing within the county.  This ballot passed despite millions of dollars spent in opposition by major oil companies like Chevron Corp.  Though the ballot is just one of several other fracking bans in California counties, Monterey County is a significant oil drilling area.  The oil industry sees the measure as a dangerous development in a systematic shutdown of fossil fuel use.

 

While fracking is a viable and relatively clean way for the US to get its energy, it must be done under the proper conditions to ensure safety; fracking in an area where oil spills could be disastrous and seismic activity could lead to natural disaster should be put to a stop.  In a location like Monterey, that thrives off its marine life, a ban on fracking is an obvious decision.  When the federal government cannot be counted on to protect areas where fracking could mean catastrophe, local government must follow suit of Monterey County.

California fights against offshore fracking

Cain, G. W. (2016, December 19). California sues to block offshore oil fracking. Retrieved

March 13, 2017, from http://www.ocregister.com/articles/california-738926-oil-

environmental.html

On December 19th, 2016, California Attorney General Kamala Harris filed suit to ban hydraulic fracking off the coast of California.  Filed by the Harris office and the California Coastal Commission, the complaint challenges an assessment by the Federal Department of the Interior that failed to address many of the potential environmental risks that come with fracking.  Fracking is not new to California, but has been used on a limited basis in places like Long Beach, Seal Beach, Huntington Beach, and the Santa Barbara channel.  The complaint seeks to reimpose a ban placed on fracking on new leases off the coast of Southern California.  The suit comes as another attempt by Californian Democrats to strengthen environmental protection laws in preparation of Donald Trump’s presidency.

 

In comparison to petroleum and coal, fracking looks to be a cleaner solution to the US’ energy demands; however, given the health and geological risks that come with fracking, it would irresponsible not to pay attention to where fracking is happening.  It is hard not to call into question the safety of offshore fracking given the risk of a large scale oil spill or earthquake.  To allow offshore fracking in California without strict surveying of sites would be thoughtless, however an outright ban of fracking may be reactionary.

California’s need to tighten fracking restrictions

Board, M. N. (2017, January 06). Editorial: California must tighten fracking regulations.

Retrieved March 13, 2017, from http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/01/06/editorial-

california-must-tighten-fracking-regulations/

 

The EPA’s final report on fracking’s impact on water supplies reveals more danger than previously thought, but under the Trump administration, a tightening of restrictions on fracking is unlikely.  The report reassessed a previous statement refuting a systematic contamination of water supplies found by fracking, concluding that there is potential to pollute drinking water.  The report particularly warned against the use of groundwater for fracking in places where water supplies are low, much like California which has only just come out of severe drought.

 

Government must protect its citizens’ water sources.  Given how much of California’s economy is driven by agriculture, state government must protect its water at all costs.  Only just coming out of severe drought, California should be wary of the use of groundwater for fracking.  Since it is clear that the Trump administration will do nothing to protect California’s water sources, state legislation must work to place restrictions on fracking to ensure its citizens and industry will not be put at risk of losing their water.

Chevron and Aera Energy sue Monterey County over fracking ban

Buhl, L. (2017, March 08). Chevron, Aera Energy sue to block Monterey County, California’s

voter-approved ban on fracking. Retrieved March 13, 2017, from

http://www.nationofchange.org/2017/03/09/chevron-aera-energy-sue-block-monterey-

county-californias-voter-approved-ban-fracking/

 

In December, Aera Energy and Chevron, sued Monterey County to block the rolling out of the recently passed Measure Z.  Measure Z, passed in November, banned hydraulic fracturing as well as the opening of new oil and gas wells, making Monterey County the sixth in California to ban fracking.  The measure means a ban on fracking in San Ardo Fields, the 46th biggest oil fields in the country; as the two biggest companies drilling in the San Ardo Fields, Chevron and Aera undoubtedly have financial stakes in the measure.  In response to the lawsuits, the Monterey County Supreme Court issued a partial stay on Measure Z, allowing the opening of new wells despite the passing of the measure.  Proponents of Measure Z have claimed that it was necessary to ban fracking on a local level after Gov. Jerry Brown rejected a statewide ban on fracking.

Without any nationwide or statewide bans on fracking, Measure Z serves as Monterey County’s only form of protection against hydraulic fracturing.  Oil interests see the lawsuits as test cases for other bans involving oil extraction, making this case vital for opponents of fracking.  It seems clear that the EPA’s latest report on the dangers of fracking has had no effect on the Trump Administration’s plans so any bans on fracking must be done at a state or local level; if the Chevron and Aera’s lawsuits are able to stop the implementation of Measure Z, Monterey County will have to look to the state of California to ban fracking.